Crypto advocacy groups oppose Illinois digital asset tax in court
The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and Blockchain Association (BA) filed a lawsuit against Illinois officials regarding the state’s 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency, expected to be enforced starting in January 2027. In a lawsuit filed Friday in the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit for Sangamon County, lawyers for the two crypto advocacy groups challenged Illinois’ digital asset tax on the grounds it violated the US Constitution, the state’s constitution, federal and state due process laws and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act.

Why It Matters
This story touches on digital, crypto, advocacy — topics readers are actively tracking. Review and add editorial context before publishing.
Key Facts
- Fact 1: The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and Blockchain Association (BA) filed a lawsuit against Illinois officials regarding the state’s 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency, expected to be enforced starting in January 2027.
- Fact 2: Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed the measure into law as a “privilege tax” in June as part of the state’s fiscal year 2027 budget, requiring crypto users to be taxed as applied to transaction volume rather than income.
- Fact 3: Related: Nigeria sets crypto tax collection rules for digital asset platforms Illinois also targeting prediction markets Opposition to the crypto tax came amid prediction market platform Kalshi’s lawsuit against Illinois officials over a law that went into effect on July 1.
The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) and Blockchain Association (BA) filed a lawsuit against Illinois officials regarding the state’s 0.2% tax on cryptocurrency, expected to be enforced starting in January 2027. In a lawsuit filed Friday in the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit for Sangamon County, lawyers for the two crypto advocacy groups challenged Illinois’ digital asset tax on the grounds it violated the US Constitution, the state’s constitution, federal and state due process laws and the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed the measure into law as a “privilege tax” in June as part of the state’s fiscal year 2027 budget, requiring crypto users to be taxed as applied to transaction volume rather than income. On the due process claim, CCI and BA argued that the tax was “unconstitutionally vague” by placing the burden on residents and brokers “under the threat of serious civil and criminal penalties” to determine what and how such assets were taxed. Notably, the crypto organizations’ arguments under the US Constitution were based on alleged violations of the Commerce Clause covering interstate commerce, claiming that the state tax “creat[ed] the specter of duplicative taxation.” “States have an important role to play in fostering innovation, but that authority has constitutional limits,” said Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association and a former commissioner at the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
(Original synthesis pending human/AI review — generated by the stub provider by selecting real sentences from the source material, not by writing new analysis or commentary.)
Original source: Cointelegraph
Related Stories

Zerohash back for second effort at OCC trust bank charter

Alibaba to Release Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next as a Preview of What Qwen 4 Will Offer

XRP Hot Streak Cools as Traders Hit a Wall: Where Does It Go Next?
